 |
The Condensed
Edition of
Desiderius Erasmus'
In Praise of Folly
... in 2,800 words
"Fortune favours the fool."
|
INTRODUCTION to Desiderius Erasmus' In Praise of Folly
Gerrit Gerritzoons was born in Gouda (near
Rotterdam), probably in October 1466. After both his
parents died in the plague of 1483, he followed his
father's profession and became a priest. Quick-witted
and witty, he was befriended by the Bishop of Cambrai
and sent to Paris to study. But he soon came to despise
the nit-picking 'scholastic' teachings, acquired the
pseudonym of Desiderius Erasmus and took to instructing
the sons of nobles, wandering Europe and earning the
friendship of the continents leading scholars. His first
visit to England in brought him into contact with Thomas
More, John Colet, Henry VIII and the new rational
anti-clericalism of which he is now considered the
leading light.
|
THE VERY SQUASHED VERSION
I am Stultitia, Goddess of Folly, from whom
gods and men derive all cheerfulness. I am
incapable of deceit. Look how great Jupiter
has given men an ounce of reason to each
pound of passion. The male sex is born to
transact the business of the world, but
Jupiter took my advice and added women-
foolish and frivolous but with the beauty
which lets them rule the world. Says Plato.
"states will prosper when guided by
philosophy." But history tells us otherwise.
I charm away woes, and makes life bearable.
It is I who make old men wear wigs. As to
the wisdom of the learned professions, the
more empty-headed any one of them is, the
more he will be thought of. Fake physicians,
pettifogging lawyers, chattering barristers-
and they make for themselves fortunes! I
make men drunk like wine! It is I who
alleviate the drudgery of the schoolmaster.
The poets ought to laud me, but waste their
time with manuscripts and the praise of few.
The servile, insipid, empty-headed court
grandees frankly live a life of folly with
their lazy religion and ridiculous pastimes.
Popes, cardinals and bishops are no better.
So, live and drink lustily, my most
excellent disciples of Folly! |
ABOUT
THIS SQUASHED VERSION
This condensed edition of 2,800 words is
paraphrased and adapted from the original 36,800
words of the 1668 translation by John Wilson.
GLOSSARY
Bacchus: Personification of wine
Apollo: Personification of sunlight,
prophecy and music.
Bruti: The two Brutuses - Marcus Junius
Brutus and Marcus Decimus Brutus, assassins of Julius
Caesar
Cassius: Gaius Cassius, another
assassin of Julius Caesar.
Cato: Marcus Porcius Cato the Younger
and his great grandfather of the same name
Chiron: In Greek myth the tutor of
heroes, who refused imortality
Cicero: Marcus Tullius
Cicero
Diogenes: Ancient Greek Philosopher who
rejected comfort.
Gracchi: The 1st century BC reforming
Roman brothers Tiberius Sempronius and Gaius Sempronius
Gracchus.
Hesiod: One of the earliest of Greek
poets.
Homer: The reputed source of many Greek
myths and stories.
Jupiter: Chief of the gods
Kolakia: The Greek word for flattery
Marcus Antoninus: Roman General.
Mars: The personification of war
Minerva: The personification of skills
Neptune: The personification of the
sea.
Phaon: In Greek myth, the ugly Lesbian
boatman made beautiful by Aphrodite's magical ointment.
Philautia: The personification of
self-love.
Phoebus: The most wide-ranging of the
Greek godly personifications
Plutus: The personification of wealth
Quintilian: 1st Century AD Roman
educationalist.
Saturn: The personification of growth
In
Praise of Folly
by
Desiderius Erasmus, 1509
Squashed version edited by
Glyn
Hughes
© 2005
ERASMUS OF ROTTERDAM to his friend
THOMAS MORE,
health:
As I was coming awhile since out of Italy for
England, that I might not waste all that time on
horseback in foolish and illiterate fables, I
took me to composing of this:
IN
PRAISE OF FOLLY
An invented oration, spoken by Folly in her own
person
IN
whatever manner I, the Goddess of Folly, may be
generally spoken of by mortals (for I well know what ill
reports are given of me), yet I assert emphatically that
it is from me, Stultitia, and from my influence only,
that gods and men derive all mirth and cheerfulness. You
laugh, I see. Well, even that is a telling argument in
my favour. Actually now, in this most numerous assembly,
as soon as ever I have opened my mouth, the counenances
of all have instantly brightened up with fresh hilarity,
whereas but a few moments ago you were all looking
woebegone.
On my very brow my name is written. No one would take
me, Stultitia, for Minerva. No one would contend that I
am the Goddess of Wisdom. The mere expression of my
countenance tells its own tale. Not only am I incapable
of deceit, but even those who are under my sway are
incapable of deceit likewise. From my illustrious sire,
Plutus [Wealth] I glory to be sprung, for he, and no
other, was the great progenitor of gods and men, and I
care not what Hesiod, or Homer, or even Jupiter himself
may maintain to the contrary. Everything, I affirm, is
subjected to the control of Plutus. War, peace, empires,
designs, judicial decisions, weddings, treaties,
alliances, laws, arts, things ludicrous and things
serious, are all administered under his sovereign will.
Now notice the admirable foresight which nature
exercises in order to ensure that men shall never be
destitute of folly as the principal ingredient in their
constitution. Wisdom, as your divines and moralists put
it, consists in men being guided by their reason; and
folly, in their being actuated by their passions. See
then here what Jupiter has done. In order to prevent the
life of man from being utterly intolerable, he has
endowed him with reason in singularly small proportion
to his passions- only, so to speak, as a half-ounce is
to a pound. And whereas he has dispersed his passions
over every portion of his body, he has confined his
reason to a narrow little crevice in his skull.
And yet, of these silly human beings, the male sex is
born under the necessity of transacting the business of
the world. When Jupiter was taking counsel with me I
advised him to add a woman to the man- a creature
foolish and frivolous, but full of laughter and
sweetness, who would season and sweeten by her folly the
sadness of his manly intelligence. When Plato doubted
whether or not he should place women in the class of
rational animals, he really only wished to indicate the
remarkable silliness of that sex. Yet women will not be
so absolutely senseless as to be offended if I, a woman
myself, the goddess Stultitia, tell them thus plainly
that they are fools. They will, if they look at the
matter aright, be flattered by it. For they are by many
degrees more favoured than men. They have beauty, and
what a gift is that! By its power they rule the rulers
of the world.
The supreme wish of women is to win the admiration of
men, and they have no more effectual means to this end
than folly. Men, no doubt, will contend that it is the
pleasure they have in women's society, and not their
folly, that attracts them.
I answer that their pleasure, is folly, and nothing but
folly, in which they delight. You see, then, from what
fountain is derived the highest and most exquisite
enjoyment that falls to man's lot in life.
But there are some men (they are waning old crones, most
of them), who love their glasses better than the lasses,
and place their chief delight in tippling. Others love
to make fools of themselves to raise a laugh at a feast,
and I beg to say that of laughter, fun and pleasantry,
I- Folly- am the sole purveyor.
So much for the notion that wisdom is of any use in the
pleasures of life. The next thing that our gods of
wisdom will assert is that wisdom is necessary for
affairs of state. Says Plato. "Those states will prosper
whose rulers are guided by the spirit of philosophy."
With this opinion I totally disagree. Consult history,
and it will tell you that the two Catos, Brutus,
Cassius, the Gracchi, Cicero and Marcus Antoninus all
disturbed the tranquillity of the state and brought down
on them by their philosophy the disgust and disfavour of
the citizens. And who are the men who are most prone,
from weariness of life, to seek to put an end to it?
Why, men of reputed wisdom. Not to mention Diogenes, the
Catos, the Cassii and the Bruti, there is the remarkable
case of Chiron, who, though he actually had immortality
conferred on him, voluntarily preferred death.
You see, then, that if men were universally wise the
world would be depopulated, and there would be need of a
new creation. But, since the world generally is under
the influence of folly and not of wisdom, the case is,
happily, different. I, Folly, by inspiring men with
hopes of good things they will never get, so charm away
their woes, that they are far from wishing to die. Nay,
the less cause there is for them to desire to live, the
more, nevertheless, do they love life. It is of my
bounty that you see everywhere men of the Nestorean
longevity, mumbling, without brains, without teeth,
whose hair is white, whose heads are bald, so enamoured
of life, so eager to look youthful, that they use dyes,
wigs and other disguises, and take to wife some frisky
heifer of a creature; while aged and cadaverous-looking
women are everywhere seen caterwauling, and, as the
Greeks express it, behaving goatishly in order to induce
some beauteous Phaon to pay court to them.
As to the wisdom of the learned professions, the more
empty-headed and the more reckless any member of any one
of them is, the more he will be thought of. The
physician is always in request, and yet medicine, as it
is now frequently practised, is nothing but a system of
pure humbug. Next in repute to the physicians stand the
pettifogging lawyers, who are, according to the
philosophers, a set of asses. And asses, I grant you
that, they are. Nevertheless, it is by the will and
pleasure of these asses that the business of the world
is transacted, and they make for themselves fortunes
while the poor theologians starve.
By the immortal gods, I solemnly swear to you that the
happiest men are those whom the world calls fools,
simpletons and blockheads. For they are entirely devoid
of the fear of death. They have no accusing consciences
to make them fear it. They are, happily, without the
experience of the thousands of cares that lacerate the
minds of other men. They feel no shame, no solicitude,
no ambition, no envy, no love. And, according to the
theologians, they are free from any imputation of the
guilt of sin! Ah, ye besotted men of wisdom, you need no
further evidence than the ills you have gone through, to
convince you from what a mass of calamities I have
delivered my idiotic favourites.
To be deceived, people say, is wretched. But I hold that
what is most wretched is not to be deceived. They are in
great error who imagine that a man's happiness consists
in things as they are. No; it consists entirely in his
opinion of what they are. Man is so constituted that
falsehood is far more agreeable to him than truth. Does
anyone need proof of this? Let him visit the churches,
and assuredly he will find it. If solemn truth is dwelt
on, the listeners at once become weary, yawn and sleep;
but if the orator begins some silly tale, they are all
attention. And the saints they prefer to appeal to are
those whose histories are made up in the main of fable
and romance. Though to be deceived adds much more to
your happiness than not to be deceived, it yet costs you
much less trouble.
And now to pass to another argument in my favour. Among
all the praises of Bacchus this is the chief, that he
drives away care; but he does it only for a short time,
and then all your care comes again. How much more
complete are the benefits mankind derive from me! I also
afford them intoxication, but an intoxication whose
influence is perennial, and all, too, without cost to
them. And my favours I deny to nobody. Mars, Apollo,
Saturn, Phoebus and Neptune are more chary of their
bounties and dole them out to their favourites only, but
I confine my favours to none.
OF all the men whose things I have witnessed, the most
sordid are men of trade, and appropriately so, for they
handle money, a very sordid thing indeed. Merchants are
the biggest fools of all. Whenever it is necessary, they
will lie, perjure themselves, steal, cheat, and mislead
the public. Nevertheless, they are highly respected
because of their money. There is no lack of flattering
friars to kowtow to them, and call them Right Honorable
in public. The motive of the friars is clear: they are
after some of the loot.
But as I look round among the various classes of men, I
specially note those who are esteemed to possess more
than ordinary sagacity. Among these a foremost place is
occupied by the school-masters. How miserable would
these be were it not that I, Folly, of my benevolence,
ameliorate their wretchedness and render them insanely
happy in the midst of their drudgery. Their lot is one
of semi-starvation and of debasing slavery. In the
schools, those bride-wells of uproar and confusion, they
grow prematurely old and broken down. Yet, thanks to my
good services, they know not their own misery. For in
their own estimation they are mighty fine fellows,
strutting about and striking terror into the hearts of
trembling urchins, half scarifying the little wretches
with straps, canes and birches. In fact, their own most
wretched servitude is to them a kingdom of felicity.
The poets owe less to me. Yet they, too, are
enthusiastic devotees of mine, for their entire business
consists in tickling the ears of fools with silly
ditties and ridiculously romantic tales. Of the services
of my attendants Philautia [Self-approbation] and
Kolakia [Flattery], they never fail to avail themselves,
and really I do not know any class of men who are more
devoted and constant followers. Moreover, there are the
rhetoricians. Quintilian, the prince of them all, has
written an immense chapter on no more serious subject
than how to excite a laugh. Those, again, who hunt after
immortal fame in the domain of literature unquestionably
belong to my fraternity. Poor fellows! They pass a
wretched existence poring over their manuscripts, and
for what reward? For the praise of the very, very
limited few who are capable of appreciating their
erudition.
Very naturally, the barristers merit our attention next.
Talk of feminine garrulity! Why, I would back any one of
them to win a prize for chattering against any twenty of
the most talkative women that you could pick out. And
well indeed would it be if they had no worse fault than
that. I am bound to say that they are not only
loquacious, but astoundingly pugnacious.
After these come the philosophers, who are reverenced
for their beards and the fur on their gowns. They
announce that they alone are wise and that the rest of
men are only passing shadows. The fact that they can
never explain why they constantly disagree with each
other is sufficient proof that they do not know the
truth about anything. They are ignorant even of
themselves, and are often too absent-minded or
near-sighted to see the ditch or stone in front of them.
Their insane self-deception is very delightful. They
beguile their time with computing the magnitude of the
sun, moon and stars, and they assign causes for all the
phenomena of the universe, as if nature had initiated
them into all her secrets. In reality they know nothing,
but profess to know everything.
Perhaps it would be wise to pass over the theologians in
silence. That short-tempered and supercilious crew is
unpleasant to deal with. They will proclaim me a
heretic, a thunderbolt they use to terrify the people
they don't like. Their opinion of themselves is so great
that they behave as if they were already in heaven; they
look down pityingly on other men as so many worms. A
wall of imposing definitions, conclusions, corollaries,
and explicit and implicit propositions protects them.
They are full of big words and newly-invented nonsense.
Then there
are those who commonly call themselves the religious
and monks. Both are complete misnomers, since
most of them stay as far away from religion as possible.
They are so detested that it is considered bad luck if
one crosses your path, and yet they are highly pleased
with themselves. They cannot read, and capitalize on
their dirt and poverty by whining for food from door to
door. These smooth fellows simply explain that by their
very filth, ignorance, boorishness, and insolence they
enact the lives of the apostles for us. It is amusing to
see how they do everything by rule, almost
mathematically. Any slip is sacrilege. each shoe string
must have so many knots and must be of a certain color.
They even condemn each other, these professors of
apostolic charity, making an extraordinary stir if a
habit is belted incorrectly or if its color is a shade
too dark. The monks of certain orders recoil in horror
from money, as if it were poison, but not from wine or
women. They take extreme pains, not in order to be like
Christ, but to be unlike each other. Most of them
consider one heaven an inadequate reward for their
devotion to ceremony and traditional details. They
forget that Christ will condemn all of this and will
call for a reckoning of that which He has prescribed,
namely, charity.
IT is high time that I should say a few words to you
about kings and the royal princes belonging to their
courts. Very different are they from those whom I have
just been describing, who pretend to be wise when they
are the reverse, for these high personages frankly and
openly live a life of folly, and it is just that I
should give them their due, and frankly and openly tell
them so. They seem to regard it to be the duty of a king
to caress by every means in his power the vulgar
populace, in order to win their good graces, and to make
them the subservient tools of his tyrannical behests.
As for the grandees of the court, a more servile,
insipid, empty-headed set than the generality of them
you will fail to find anywhere. Yet they wish to be
regarded as the greatest personalities on earth. Not a
very modest wish, and yet, in one respect, they are
modest enough. They wish to be bedecked with gold and
gems and purple, and other external symbols of worth and
wisdom, but nothing further do they require. These
courtiers, however, are superlatively happy in the
belief that they are perfectly virtuous. They lie in bed
till 'till noon. Then they summon their chaplain to
their bedside to offer up the sacrifice of the mass, and
as the hireling priest goes through his solemn farce,
with perfunctory rapidity, they, meanwhile, have all but
dropped off again into a comfortable condition of
slumber. After this they betake themselves to breakfast;
and that is scarcely over when dinner supervenes. And
then come their pastimes- their dice, their cards and
their gambling- their merriment with jesters and
buffoons, and their gallantries with the court
favourites.
Next let us turn our attention to popes, cardinals and
bishops. If bishops did but bear in mind that a pastoral
staff is an emblem of pastoral duties, and that the
cross solemnly carried before them is a reminder of the
earnestness with which they should strive to crucify the
flesh, their lot would be one replete with sadness and
solicitude. As things are, a right bonny time do they
spend, providing abundant pasturage for themselves, and
leaving their flocks to the negligent charge of
so-called friars and vicars.
Fortune favours the fool. We colloquially speak of him
and such as him as a 'lucky bird,' while, when we speak
of a wise man, we proverbially describe him as one who
has been 'born under an evil star' and as one whose
horse will never carry him to the front. If you wish to
get a wife, mind, above all things, that you beware of
wisdom; for the girls, without exception, are heart and
soul so devoted to fools that you may rely on it a man
who has any wisdom in him they will shun as they would a
vampire.
And now, to sum up much in a few words, go among what
classes of men you will, go among popes, princes,
cardinals, judges, magistrates, friends, foes, great
men, little men, and you will not fail to find that a
man with plenty of money at his command has it in his
power to obtain everything that he sets his heart upon.
A wise man, however, despises money. And what is the
consequence? Everyone despises him!
Wherefore farewell, clap your hands, live and drink
lustily, my most excellent disciples of Folly!

Desiderius Erasmus
1466-1536
Erasmus' tomb in Basle Cathedral.

|