According
to the Sthapatya Veda (the Indian tradition of
architecture), the temple and the town should mirror
the cosmos. The temple architecture and the city plan
are, therefore, related in their conception. Volwahsen
(2001) has remarked on the continuity in the Indian
architectural tradition. The Harappan cities have a
grid plan, just as is recommended in the Vedic
manuals. The square shape represents the heavens, with
the four directions representing the cardinal
directions as well as the two solstices and the
equinoxes of the sun’s orbit.
A late
example of a city designed according to the Vedic
precepts is Jaipur. Vidyadhara, who designed the plan
of the city, used the pithapada mandala as the basis.
In this mandala of nine squares that represents the
universe, the central square is occupied by the earth.
In the city, which consists of nine large squares, the
central square is assigned to the royal palace. The
astronomical monuments of Maharaja Jai Singh II may
also be seen as embodiments of the Vedic altars (Volwahsen,
2001).
The
monument that has been studied most extensively for
its cosmological basis is the Angkor Wat temple.
Although it is located in Cambodia, it was built
according to the principles of Indian architecture
and, therefore, we will describe it at some length.
The connections between Angkor Wat and Vedic astronomy
emerged out of my own work (Kak, 1999 and Millar and
Kak, 1999).
The
astronomy and cosmology underlying the design of the
Angkor Wat temple was extensively researched in the
1970s and it is well summarized in the book by Eleanor
Mannikka (1996). Basically, it was found that the
temple served as a practical observatory where the
rising sun was aligned on the equinox and solstice
days with the western entrance of the temple, and many
sighting lines for seasonally observing the risings of
the sun and the moon were identified.
This paper
presents the basis of the Hindu temple design going
back to the earliest period. We trace this design back
to the fire altars of the Vedic period which were
themselves designed to represent astronomical
knowledge (Kak, 1995, 2000, 2002). An assumed
equivalence between the outer and the inner cosmos is
central to the conception of the temple. It is because
of this equivalence that numbers such as 108 and 360
are important in the temple design.
The number
108 represents the distance from the earth to the sun
and the moon in sun and moon diameters, respectively.
The diameter of the sun is also 108 times the diameter
of the earth, but that fact is not likely to have been
known to the Vedic rishis. This number of dance poses
(karanas) given in the Natya Shastra is also 108, as
is the number
of beads in
a rosary (japamala). The “distance” between the body and
the inner sun is also taken to be 108, and the number of
marmas in Ayurveda is 107. The total number of syllables
in the Rigveda is taken to be 432,000, a number related
to 108.
The number
360, the number of days in the civil year, is also taken
to be the number of bones in the developing foetus, a
number that fuses later into the 206 bones of the adult.
The centrality of this number in Vedic ritual is
stressed in the Shatapatha Brahmana.
The primary
Vedic number is three, representing the tripartite
division of the physical world into the earth, the
atmosphere, and the sky and that of the person into the
physical body, the pranas, and the inner sky.
The Hindu
temple also represents the Meru mountain, the navel of
the earth. The Brihat Samhita 56 lists the many design
requirements that the temple building must satisfy. For
example, it says “the height of the temple should be
double its width, and the height of the foundation above
the ground with the steps equal to a third of this
height. The sanctum sanctorum should be half the width
of the temple” and so on. It also lists twenty types of
temples that range from one to twelve storeys in height.

We first
summarize some relevant characteristics of the Angkor
Wat temple that emphasize the relationship of the
design to astronomy. This will be followed by sections
on the Vedic antecedents of the temple and the
medieval expression of the philosophy behind its
design. We will also consider the question of the
chaitya hall with its pointed arch as an alternate
tradition within India that has been connected to the
Lycian arch which may have influenced the design of
the cathedral.
The most
impressive aspect of the temple representation is that
it occurs both at the level of the part as well as the
whole in a recursive fashion, mirroring the Vedic idea
of the microcosm symbolizes the macrocosm at various
levels of expressions. This is done not only in the
domain of numbers and directions, but also using
appropriate mythological themes, and historical
incidents. The mythological scenes skillfully use the
oppositions and complementarities between the gods,
goddesses, asuras, and humans defined over ordinary
and sacred time and space.

Figure 2
Speaking
just of numbers, the various lengths and
circumferences of units representing the motion of the
moon may equal 27, 28, 29 (nakshatras or days of the
month), 354 (days of the lunar year), or 360 (tithis
of the lunar year). Other lengths represent the solar
year (360, 365, or 366) or larger time cycles. For
example, the west-east axis represents the periods of
the yugas. The width of the moat is 439.78 cubit; the
distance from the first step of the western entrance
gateway to balustrade wall at the end of causeway is
867.03 cubit; the distance from the first step of the
western entrance gateway to the first step of the
central tower is 1,296.07 cubit; and the distance from
the first step of bridge to the geographic center of
the temple is 1,734.41 cubit. These correspond to the
periods of 432,000; 864,000; 1,296,000; 1,728,000
years for the Kali, Dvapara, Treta, and Krita yuga,
respectively. It has been suggested that the very
slight discrepancy in the equations might be due to
human error or erosion or sinking of the structure.
3.
In the
central tower, the topmost elevation has external axial
dimensions of 189.00 cubit east-west, and 176.37 cubit
north-south, with the sum of 365.37. This division of
the almost exact length of the solar year into unequal
halves remained a mystery for some time until it was
found to be connected with the Shatapatha Brahmana
numbers for the asymmetric motion of the sun.
Over the
half-millenia of Khmer rule, the city of Angkor became a
great pilgrimage destination because of the notion of
Devaraja, that has been explained by Lokesh Chandra as a
coronation icon. Jayavarman II (802-850) was the first
to use this royal icon. According to Lokesh Chandra
(1995), “Devaraja means `King of the Gods' and not
`God-King'. He is Indra and refers to the highly
efficacious aindra mahabhisheka of the Rigvedic rajasuya
tradition as elaborated in the Aitareya-brahmana. It was
not a simple but a great coronation, a mahabhisheka. It
was of extraordinary significance that Jayavarman II
performed a Rigvedic rite, which lent him charismatic
authority.”
The
increasingly larger temples built by the Khmer kings
continued to function as the locus of the devotion to
the Devaraja, and were at the same time earthly and
symbolic representations of mythical Mt. Meru, the
cosmological home of the Hindu gods and the axis of the
world-system. The symbol of the king's divine authority
was the sign (linga) of Shiva within the temple's inner
sanctuary, which represented both the axes of the
physical and the psychological worlds. The worship of
Shiva and Vishnu separately, and together as Harihara,
had been popular for considerable time in southeast
Asia; Jayavarman's chief innovation was to use ancient
Vedic mahabhisheka to define the symbol of government.
To quote
Lokesh Chandra further, “The icon used by Jayavarman II
for his aindra mahabhisheka, his Devaraja = Indra
(icon), became the symbol of the Cambodian state, as the
sacred and secular sovereignty denoted by
Prajapatishvara/Brahma, as the continuity of the vital
flow of the universal (jagat) into the stability of the
terrestrial kingdom (raja = rajya}). As the founder of
the new Kambuja state, he contributed a national
palladium under its Cambodian appellation kamraten jagat
ta raja/rajya. Whenever the capital was transferred by
his successors, it was taken to the new nagara, for it
had to be constantly in the capital.”
Angkor Wat
is the supreme masterpiece of Khmer art. The
descriptions of the temple fall far short of
communicating the great size, the perfect proportions,
and the astoundingly beautiful sculpture that everywhere
presents itself to the viewer. Its architecture is
majestic and its representation of form and movement
from Indian mythology has astonishing grace and power.
The inner galleries of the temple have depiction of the
battle of Kurukshetra, procession of King Suryavarman
and his ministers, scenes from heavens and hells,
churning of the sea of milk, the battle of Vishnu and
the asuras, victory of Krishna over Bana, battle of the
devas and asuras, Ravana shaking Kailasa with Shiva and
Parvati atop, and the battle of Lanka between Rama and
Ravana. These and other scenes are drawn with great
artistic beauty. No wonder, the temple ranks amongst the
greatest creations of human imagination.
4
Numbers at
Angkor Wat
The temple
has 1300-m north-south axis and 1500-m west-east axis.
The temple faces toward the west because that situates
it to the east with respect to the worshiper, the
appropriate direction for Vishnu who is a solar deity.
At the heart of the temple are three rising, concentric
galleries. Bordering these is further space, and a
rectangular moat. About 40 m in from the moat is a
laterite wall, 4.5 m high, with large single entrances
from the east, north, and south, and five entrances on
the west.
Mannikka has
suggested that the Vastupurusha mandala at Angkor Wat
forms a grid of 49, rather than the standard of 64 or
81.
Various
numbers from the Vedic astronomy are encountered at
Angkor Wat as simple counts, or measurements in cubits,
or phyeam = 4 cubits. Some of these represent just the
basic constants of the system, while others provide
specific information related to the orientation of the
temple related to the nakshatras and the positions of
the planets. For an example of the latter, consider that
the length of the north-south axis, door to door, in the
sanctuary is 13.41 cubits, which according to Mannikka
represents the fact that the north celestial pole is
13.43 degrees above the northern horizon at Angkor. This
number is also basic to the second gallery, devoted to
Brahma who is ``situated'' at the north celestial pole.
The order in
which the planets rose over the eastern horizon at the
end of July 1131 is represented in the bas-relief of the
northwest corner pavilion: Saturn (Agni), Jupiter (Indra),
Venus (Kubera), Mars (Skanda), and Mercury (Varuna).
According to
Mannikka, the design of the temple can be seen in three
architectural units:
1. Central
sanctuary: Mount Meru, with 45 gods, the north celestial
pole, the centre of the mandala, the spring equinox, the
axis of the earth, Vishnu, Brahma, and King Suryavarman
2
Circumferences: the ecliptic, the moon and lunar
periodicity, the constellations, the planets, the
celestial year, the krita yuga, the grid of the
mandala, the
history of King Suryavarman
3 Axes: the
building blocks of time (60, 108), the yuga cycles, the
solar year, the lunar year, historical dates in
Suryavarman's reign, the mandala and its transformation
of time, and, finally, the solar year and lunar time
cycles from the vantage point of Mount Meru.
Some basic
numbers that we encounter frequently in the
architectural plan are given below. For more examples
see the book by Mannikka which, however, does not
recognize the special place of the altar numbers 78 and
261. Neither does it know the correct significance of
the number 108.
21 The earth
number shows up as the number of steps to the libraries.
27/28 This
count of nakshatras is represented at numerous places;
the total inner axes of the sanctuary.
32/33 This
represents the number of devas and it is found as the
number of pillars, windows and various lengths.
44/45 The
number of divinities of the Vastupurusha mandala are
shown in the total number of steps, main entrance and
flanking Central Western entrances. As 450 cubits,
various axial entrances and circumference of gallery.
54 As half
of the distance in sun- or moon-diameters to the sun or
the moon, 54 cubits or 54 phyeam are encountered several
places on the Western bridge and the outer enclosure.
78 The
atmosphere number is found in the central cruciform,
inner axes as 20.08 phyeam, which equals 80.32 cubits.
The 20 steps in several of the stairways to the
libraries may also represent the same number divided by
4. Further evidence for that comes from the distance of
19.42 phyeam = 77.68 cubits each library, west-east
outer axis. Since books represent the `atmosphere' in
reaching the `sky' of knowledge, its use in the context
of library is very appropriate.
108
In-and-out circumambulation of four corner towers
together; circumambulation of the central Vishnu image
from three axial entrances; inner axes of all four
corner towers without images; full vertical distance
above and below central sanctuary.
130.5/261 As
half of the sky number 261, we find it in the
circumambulation path to north end chamber, each end
gateway. The number is 32.74 phyeam which equals 130.96
cubits.
354 The
length of the lunar year in days, it is the distance
between naga balustrade and first step at end of walkway
to upper elevation.
360 In
phyeam, the circumambulation path around the Cruciform
Terrace.
366 Solar
axes of gallery from walkway on west to bases on each
side.
371 This is
the solar year in tithis, and it is found in an
in-and-out circumambulation of all four corner towers.
Solar and
lunar measurements; Temple Antecedents
The solar
and lunar numbers that show up in the design of the
Angkor Wat temple are the number of nakshatras, the
number of months in the year, the days in the lunar
month, the days of the solar month, and so on. Lunar
observations appear to have been made from the causeway.
6
The division
of the year into the two halves of 189 and 176.37 was
recently explained by the author as being derived from
the Shatapatha Brahmana. In layer 5 of the altar
described in the Shatapatha, a division of the year into
the two halves in the proportion 15:14 is given (Kak,
1998, 2000). This proportion corresponds to the numbers
189 and 176.4 used at Angkor Wat, where in the central
tower the topmost elevation has dimensions of 189
east-west and 176.37 north-south.
The
elliptical orbit of the earth together with the fact
that the sun is at a slight offset is behind the
asymmetry in the sun's orbit. The period from the
autumnal equinox to the vernal equinox is smaller than
the opposite circuit. The interval between successive
perihelia, the anomalistic year, is 365.25964 days which
is 0.01845 days longer than the tropical year on which
our calendar is based. In 1000 calendar years, the date
of the perihelion advances about 18 days. The perihelion
was roughly on December 18 during the time of the
construction of Angkor Wat; and it was on October 27
during early 2nd millennium BC, the most likely period
of the composition of the Shatapatha Brahmana. In all
these cases the perihelion occurs during the
autumn/winter period, and so by Kepler's 2nd law we know
that the speed of the sun in its orbit around the earth
is greater during the months autumn and winter than in
spring and summer.
During the
time of the Shatapatha Brahmana, the apogee was about
midway through the spring season, which was then
somewhat more than 94 days. The extra brick in the
spring quadrant may symbolically reflect the discovery
that this quarter had more days in it, a discovery made
at a time when a satisfactory formula had not yet been
developed for the progress of the sun on the ecliptic.
It is
possible that the period from the spring equinox to the
fall equinox was taken to be about 189 days by doubling
the period of the spring season; 176 days became the
period of the reverse circuit.
Why not
assume that there was no more to these numbers than a
division into the proportions 15:14 derived from some
numerological considerations? First, we have the
evidence from the Shatapatha Brahmana that expressly
informs us that the count of days from the winter to the
summer solstice was different, and shorter, than the
count in the reverse order. Second, the altar design is
explicitly about the sun's circuit around the earth and
so the proportion of 15:14 must be converted into the
appropriate count with respect to the length of the
year. Furthermore, the many astronomical alignments of
the Angkor Wat impress on us the fairly elaborate system
of naked-eye observations that were the basis of the
temple astronomy.
But since
precisely the same numbers were used in Angkor Wat as
were mentioned much earlier in the Shatapatha Brahmana,
one would presume that
these
numbers were used as a part of ancient sacred lore. The
count between the solstices has been changing much
faster than the count between the equinoxes because the
perigee has been, in the past two thousand years
somewhere between the autumn and the winter months.
Because of its relative constancy, the count between the
equinoxes became one of the primary `constants' of
Vedic/Puranic astronomy.
7
The
equinoctial half-years are currently about 186 and
179, respectively; and were not much different when
Angkor Wat temple was constructed. Given that the
length of the year was known to considerable precision
there is no reason to assume that these counts were
not known. But it appears that a `normative' division
according to the ancient proportion was used.
As it was
known that the solar year was about 365.25 days, the
old proportion of 15:14 would give the distribution
188.92 and 176.33, and that is very much the Angkor
Wat numbers of 189 and 176.37 within human error. In
other words, the choice of these `constants' may have
been determined by the use of the ancient proportion
of 15:14.
Astronomy
of Altars and Temples
We now
present the Vedic astronomical tradition at the basis
of Angkor Wat and the other Indian Hindu temples. In a
series of publications I have shown (Kak, 1992, 1993,
1995, 2000) that the Vedic altars had an astronomical
basis related to the reconciliation of the lunar and
solar years. The fire altars symbolized the universe
and there were three types of altars representing the
earth, the space and the sky. The altar for the earth
was drawn as circular, whereas the sky (or heaven)
altar was drawn as square. The geometric problems of
circulature of a square and that of squaring a circle
are a result of equating the earth and the sky altars.
The fire
altars were surrounded by 360 enclosing stones, of
these 21 were around the earth altar, 78 around the
space altar and 261 around the sky altar.

8
In other
words, the earth, the space, and the sky are
symbolically assigned the numbers 21, 78, and 261.
Considering the earth/cosmos dichotomy, the two
numbers are 21 and 339 since cosmos includes the space
and the sky.
The main
altar was built in five layers. The basic square shape
was modified to several forms, such as falcon and
turtle. These altars were built in five layers, of a
thousand bricks of specified shapes. The construction
of these altars required the solution to several
geometric and algebraic problems.
Two
different kinds of bricks were used: the special and
the ordinary. The total number of the special bricks
used was 396, explained as 360 days of the year and
the additional 36 days of the intercalary month. Two
kinds of day counts: the solar day, and tithi, whose
mean value is the lunar year divided into 360 parts.
Considering the altar by layers, the first has 98, the
second has 41, the third has 71, the fourth has 47 and
the fifth has 138. The sum of the bricks in the fourth
and the fifth layers equals 186 tithis of the
half-year. The number of bricks in the third and the
fourth layers equals the integer nearest to one third
the number of days in the lunar year, and the number
of bricks in the third layer equals the integer
nearest to one fifth of the number of days in the
lunar year, and so on.
The number
of ordinary bricks equals 10,800 which equals the
number of muhurtas in a year (1 day = 30 muhurtas), or
equivalently the number of days in 30 years. Of these
21 go into the garhapatya, 78 into the eight dhishnya
hearths, and the rest go into the ahavaniya altar.
The main
altar was an area of 7 1/2 units. This area was taken
to be equivalent to the nominal year of 360 days. Each
subsequent year, the shape was to be reproduced with
the area increased by one unit.
Three
different years were considered: (1) nakshatra, or a
year of 324 days (sometimes 324 tithis) obtained by
considering 12 months of 27 days each, where this 27
is the ideal number of days in a lunar month; (2)
lunar, which is a fraction more than 354 days (360
tithis); and (3) solar, which is in excess of 365 days
(between 371 and 372 tithis).
A
well-known altar ritual says that altars should be
constructed in a sequence of 95, with progressively
increasing areas. The increase in the area, by one
unit yearly, in building progressively larger fire
altars is 48 tithis which is about equal to the
intercalation required to make the nakshatra year in
tithis equal to the solar year in tithis. But there is
a residual excess which in 95 years adds up to 89
tithis; it appears that after this period such a
correction was made. The 95 year cycle corresponds to
the tropical year being equal to 365.24675 days. The
cycles needed to harmonize various motions led to the
concept of increasing periods and world ages.
The number
of syllables in the Rigveda confirms the textual
references that the book was to represent a symbolic
altar. According to various early texts, the number of
syllables in the Rigveda is 432,000, which is the
number of muhurtas in forty years. In reality the
syllable count is somewhat less because certain
syllables are supposed to be left
9
unspoken.
The verse count of the Rigveda can be viewed as the
number of sky days in forty years or 261 x 40 =
10,440, and the verse count of all the Vedas is 261 x
78 = 20,358.
The
Brahmanas and the Shulbasutras tell us about the altar
of chhandas and meters, so we would expect that the
total Rigvedic hymn count of 1017 and the group count
of 216 have particular significance. Owing to the
pervasive tripartite ideology of the Vedic books we
choose to view the hymn number as 339 x 3. The
tripartite ideology refers to the consideration of
time in three divisions of past, present, and future
and the consideration of space in the three divisions
of the northern celestial hemisphere, the plane that
is at right angle to the earth's axis, and the
southern celestial hemisphere. The number 339 is
simply the number of disks of the sun or the moon to
measure the path across the sky: pi times 108 is
approximately 339. The number 216 represents the
distance to the sky, which was twice the distance of
108 to the sun. The Rigvedic code then expresses a
fundamental connection between the numbers 339 and
108.
As
mentioned before, the number 108 is actually the
average distance that the sun is in terms of its own
diameter from the earth; likewise, it is also the
average distance that the moon is in terms of its own
diameter from the earth. It is owing to this marvelous
coincidence that the angular size of the sun and the
moon, viewed from the earth, is about identical. It is
easy to compute this number. The angular measurement
of the sun can be obtained quite easily during an
eclipse. The angular measurement of the moon can be
made on any clear full moon night.
An easy
check on this measurement would be to make a person
hold a pole at a distance that is exactly 108 times
its length and confirm that the angular measurement is
the same. Nevertheless, the computation of this number
would require careful observations. Note that 108 is
an average and due to the ellipticity of the orbits of
the earth and the moon the distances vary with the
seasons. It is likely, therefore, that observations
did not lead to the precise number 108, but it was
chosen as the true value of the distance since it is
equal to 27 x 4, because of the mapping of the sky
into 27 nakshatras. In reality, the diameter of the
sun is also about 108 times the diameter of the earth.
But it is unlikely that the Vedic sages knew of this
fact.
The temple
is considered in the image of the Cosmic Purusha, on
whose body is displayed all creation in its
materiality and movement. Paradoxically, the space of
the Purusha (Rigveda 10.90) is in the sanctuary only
ten fingers wide, although he pervades the earth. The
prototype of the temple is the Agnikshetra, the sacred
ground on which the Vedic altars are built. The
Agnikshetra is an oblong or trapezoidal area on which
the fire altars are built. Tripathi (1990) has argued
that the agnichayana sacred ground provides the
prototype, because in it is installed a golden disc (rukma)
with 21 knobs or hangings representing the sun with a
golden image of the purusha on it. Tripathi shows that
the detailed ritual includes components that would now
be termed Shaivite, Vaishnava, or Shakta. In Nachiketa
Agni, 21 bricks of gold are placed one top of the
other in a form of shivalinga. The disk of the rukma,
which is placed in the navel of the altar on a lotus
leaf
10
is in
correspondence to the lotus emanating from Vishnu’s
navel which holds the universe. Several bricks are
named after goddesses, such as the seven krittikas.
The temple
is the representation of the cosmos both at the level
of the universe and the individual, making it possible
for the devotee to get inspired to achieve his own
spiritual transformation. The purusha placed within
the brick structure of the altar represents the
consciousness principle within the individual. It is
like the relic within the stupa.
Complementing the tradition of the Vedic ritual was
that of the munis and yogis who lived in caves and
performed austerities. From this tradition arose the
vihara, where the priests lived. The chaitya hall that
also housed the stupa may be seen as a development out
of the agnichayana tradition where within the brick
structure of the altar were buried the rukma and the
golden man (see Shatapatha Brahmana 7.4.1 for details;
7.4.2 describes how above the man is placed a
perforated brick which encases it like a casket).

Figure 4.
Chaitya cave 9 at Ajanta
The
rock-cut chaityas represent a variant form of a
tradition that was usually implemented using wood or
brick. The evidence for that comes from the very
nature of the structure with its beams. A conjectured
wooden chaityagriha is shown in Figure 5. The mature
temple is thus an organic development of the Vedic
tradition. Further evidence for wooden structures is
provided by a painting from Ajanta given in Figure 6.
11

Figure 5.
A conjectural reconstruction of a wooden chaityagriha
(from Percy Brown’s Indian Architecture, 1942)

Figure 6.
Painting of a wooden house in Ajanta
12

Figure 7.
Chaitya Cave in Karli (courtesy Takeo Kamiya)
The
rock-cut temples preserve features of earlier
structures that have not survived. For example, we see
the pointed arch of the chaitya halls that is not seen
in other monuments on the ground made of brick or
stone until the 8th
or 9th
century. In the words of Susan Huntington
(1985) regarding the Lomash Rishi cave: “The
sophisticated woodworking techniques recorded in the
cave makes it certain that ancient India had an
elaborate and lengthy history of wooden architecture
prior to the Maurya period, though some of the forms
are only preserved then.”

Figure 8.
Lomash Rishi Cave
The temple
construction begins with the Vastupurusha mandala,
which is a yantra, mostly divided into 64 (8 x 8) or
81 (9 x 9) squares, which are the seats of 45
divinities. Brahma is at the centre, around him 12
squares represent the Adityas, and in the outer circle
are
13
28 squares
that represent the nakshatras (Figure 9). The
Vastumandala with its border is the place where the
motions of the sun and the moon and the planets are
reconciled. It is the Vastu in which the decrepit, old
Chyavana of the Rigveda 1.116.10 asks his sons to put
him down so that he would become young again. Chyavana
is the moon and Sukanya, whom he desires, is the sun.

Figure 9.
In the
basic Vedic scheme the circle represents the earth and
the square represents the heavens or the deity. But
the altar or the temple, as a representation of the
dynamism of the universe, requires a breaking of the
symmetry of the square. As seen clearly in the
agnichayana and other altar constructions, this is
done in a variety of ways. Although the main altar
might be square or its derivative, the overall sacred
area is taken to be a departure from this shape. In
particular, the temples to the goddess are drawn on a
rectangular plan. In Shiva or Vishnu temples, which
are square, change is represented by a play of
diagonal lines. These diagonals are essentially
kinetic and are therefore representative of movement
and stress. They embody the time-factor in a
composition.
In the
Shilpa Prakasha} 1.90-106, a 9th-12th century Orissan
temple architecture text, Ramachandra Kaulachara
describes the Yogini Yantra for the layout of the
goddess temple. Alice Boner writes (in Kaulacara,
1966),
14
[The Devi
temples] represent the creative expanding forces, and
therefore could not be logically be represented by a
square, which is an eminently static form. While the
immanent supreme principle is represented by the
number ONE, the first stir of creation initiates
duality, which is the number TWO, and is the producer
of THREE and FOUR and all subsequent numbers up to the
infinite.
The
dynamism is expressed by a doubling of the square to a
rectangle or the ratio 1:2, where the garbhagriha is
now built in the geometrical centre. For a
three-dimensional structure, the basic
symmetry-breaking ratio is 1:2:4, which can be
continued further to another doubling.
The
constructions of the Harappan period (2600-1900 BC)
appear to be according to the same principles. The
dynamic ratio of 1:2:4 is the most commonly
encountered size of rooms of houses, in the overall
plan of houses and the construction of large public
buildings. This ratio is also reflected in the overall
plan of the large walled sector at Mohenjo-Daro called
the citadel mound. It is even the most commonly
encountered brick size.
There is
evidence of temple structures in the Harappan period
in addition to iconography that recalls the goddess.
Structures dating to 2000 BC, built in the design of
yantras, have been unearthed in northern Afghanistan.
There is ample evidence for a continuity in the
religious and artistic tradition of India from the
Harappan times, if not earlier. These ideas and the
astronomical basis continued in the architecture of
the temples of the classical age. Kramrisch has argued
that the number 25,920, the number of years in the
precessional period of the earth, is also reflected in
the plan of the temple.
As a
representation of the macrocosm, change in the temple
is described in terms of the motions of the heavenly
bodies. According to Alice Boner (Kaulacara, 1966):
But in
asmuch as it incorporates in a single synthesis the
unequal courses of the sun, the moon and the planets,
it also symbolizes all recurrent time sequences: the
day, the month, the year and the wider cycles marked
by the recurrence of a complete cycle of eclipses,
when the sun and the moon are readjusted in their
original positions, a new cycle of creation begins.
The Hindu
temple, as a conception of the astronomical frame of
the universe,
serves the
same purpose as the Vedic altar, which reconciled the
motions of the sun and the moon. The progressive
complexity of the classical temple was inevitable
given an attempt to bring in the cycles of the planets
and other ideas of the yugas into the scheme.
Concluding
Remarks
This paper
has shown how the Hindu temple represents the outer
and the inner cosmos. The outer cosmos is expressed in
terms of various astronomical connections between the
temple structure and the motions of the sun, the moon,
and the planets. The inner cosmos is represented in
terms of the consciousness at the womb of the temple
and various levels
15
of the
superstructure that correspond to the states of
consciousness. The position of the gods in the
vastupurushamandala within the temple is a symbolic
representation of the spatial projections of the cosmic
purusha in his own body.
The temple
must be seen as a structure that gives us considerable
information about the science and cosmology of its
times. Regarding technology behind the constructions,
one must look at each structure separately and see how
it fits in the evolving techniques of design and
artistic representation across the region.
References
Boner, A.,
1962. Principles of Composition in Hindu Sculpture. E.J.
Brill, Leiden, 1962, page 27.
Huntington,
S., 1985. The Art of Ancient India. Weatherhill, New
York.
Kak, S.,
1992. ``Astronomy of the Vedic altars and the Rigveda'',
Mankind Quarterly, 33, 43-55.
Kak, S.,
1993. ``Astronomy of the Vedic Altars," Vistas in
Astronomy, 36, 117-140.
Kak, S.,
1995. ``The astronomy of the age of geometric altars,"
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 36,
385-396.
Kak, S.,
1998. ``The sun's orbit in the Brahmanas,'' Indian
Journal of History of Science, 33, 175-191.
Kak, S.,
1999. ``The solar equation in Angkor Wat,'' Indian
Journal of History of Science, vol. 34, pp. 117-126.
Kak, S.,
2000. The Astronomical Code of the Rgveda. Munshiram
Manoharlal, New Delhi.
Kak, S.,
2002. The Gods Within. Munshiram Manoharlal, New Delhi.
Kamiya, T.
2002. Lycian influence to Indian cave temples. http://www.ne.jp/asahi/arc/ind/lycia/liki_eng.htm
Kaulacara,
R., 1966. Silpa Prakasa. Boner, A. and Rath Sarma, S.
(eds.). E.J. Brill, Leiden, 1966.
Kramrisch,
S., 1946. The Hindu Temple. The University of Calcutta,
Calcutta, 1946; Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1991, page
35-36.
Lokesh
Chandra, 1995. ``Devaraja in Cambodian history'', In
Cultural Horizons of India. Aditya Prakashan, New Delhi.
|